A coach named Rachel messaged me after a particularly frustrating session.
“I have twelve players. Four of them could play two age groups up. Four of them are still learning which foot to kick with. And tonight I managed to bore both groups simultaneously.”
I laughed because I recognised exactly what she was describing. I had lived it myself for years.
After talking with hundreds of coaches in our community, I kept hearing the same five problems. Not occasionally. Constantly. Every week, someone new would describe one of these challenges as if it were unique to them.
It is not unique. These problems are universal. And the solutions that work are surprisingly consistent.
The Mixed Ability Problem
Rachel’s situation was the classic version. Wide ability gaps in the same group. The advanced players coast through activities that challenge the developing players. Everyone’s bored for different reasons.
A coach named Tom found a solution that changed his sessions completely.
“I stopped designing one exercise for everyone,” he told me. “I started designing one exercise with multiple versions.”
His example was a passing drill. The basic version had players passing through a gate to a partner. For developing players, the gate was two yards wide and they could take unlimited touches.
For the advanced players in the same exercise, Tom narrowed the gate to one yard, added time pressure, and required one-touch passing.
Same activity. Same space. Same equipment. Different challenge levels. Both groups working at the edge of their ability.
The key insight is designing activities where success looks different for different players. When Tom added a defender to the advanced version while keeping the developing players unopposed, both groups were struggling and growing at the same time.
His sessions stopped being boring for anyone because everyone was appropriately challenged.
The Solo Coaching Problem
“I coach a 9v9 squad solo,” a coach named Daniel wrote. “Started the season with fourteen players. No assistants. No parent helpers. I am losing my mind.”
I remember those sessions myself. Running between groups. Missing coaching moments. Watching quality deteriorate because I could not be everywhere.
Daniel found a system that made solo coaching manageable.
Station-based training was the first piece. Three or four activities running simultaneously. Small groups rotating every eight to ten minutes. Daniel moved between stations to coach, spending the most time where players needed the most help.
Self-managing games were the second piece. He had set clear rules and let players play. Intervene only when necessary. Trust them to problem-solve. The game itself became the teacher while he coached elsewhere.
Arrival activities were the third piece. Ball mastery circuits ready when players arrived. They started immediately, no waiting for Daniel to give instructions. By the time the last player showed up, everyone had been active for fifteen minutes.
“The station approach actually improved my coaching,” Daniel told me later. “I spend focused time on specific skills instead of generic instructions to everyone. And the players learned to manage themselves.”
The Boredom Problem
“Keeping sessions fresh to avoid boredom” appeared in so many community posts that I started tracking patterns.
The coaches struggling with boredom usually had the same issue. They thought freshness meant new drills. They were constantly searching for activities their players had not seen before.
A coach named Michelle flipped this completely.
“I have about twelve core activities,” she explained. “I have been using them for three seasons. My players never get bored.”
Her secret was variation within familiar structures. Same themes, different challenges. Same activities, different constraints.
Her weekly rotation looked like this. Week one focused on ball mastery. Week two was passing and receiving. Week three covered 1v1s. Week four was finishing. Then she repeated with variations.
The passing exercise from week two might return in week six, but now with limited touches. The 1v1 from week three might return in week seven, but in a tighter space.
“Players like familiarity,” Michelle told me. “They like getting better at things they recognise. The novelty comes from new challenges within familiar activities, not from learning new rules every session.”
She was adapting what worked rather than constantly starting from scratch. Her Sunday planning took twenty minutes instead of two hours.
The Ball-Hog Problem
“I am coaching 9-10 year olds and they want to go solo instead of working together.”
This coach could have been any of dozens I have talked with. The player who sees the goal and ignores teammates. The dribbler who runs into trouble instead of passing. Individual glory over team play.
Lecturing about teamwork never works. I tried it for years.
A coach named Steve found a better approach.
“I stopped telling them to pass,” he said. “I started designing games where passing was obviously the smarter option.”
His overload games created 4v2 or 5v3 situations where success required combination play. Going solo got punished by numbers. Players figured out quickly that passing worked better.
His reward systems celebrated assists alongside goals. Points for setting up teammates. Bonus for one-touch finishes. Recognition for the pass before the assist.
His constraints made solo play impossible. Maximum three touches before passing. Must involve multiple players before shooting. Goals only count from combination play.
“The environment teaches the lesson,” Steve explained. “I am not the bad guy saying do not dribble. The game itself shows them why passing works.”
His ball-hogs became playmakers because the activities rewarded different behaviour.
The Parent Problem
“The biggest downside of pay-to-play is that parents can be very opinionated.”
Rachel again. This time about a parent who had questioned her selection decisions publicly after a match.
Parent management challenges come in familiar forms. Questioning selection. Coaching from the touchline. Unrealistic expectations. Complaints about playing time.
A coach named James rarely dealt with parent problems. I asked him why.
“Investment upfront,” he said. “Pre-season meeting. Clear expectations. Written agreement.”
His pre-season meeting covered his coaching philosophy explained clearly. Roles and responsibilities defined for everyone, including parents. Communication protocols established, including a 24-hour rule after matches before discussing concerns. A written agreement signed by parents committing to the approach.
His ongoing management included regular positive communication. Development updates that talked about progress, not just results. Private conversations for concerns rather than sideline debates.
“The parents who cause problems usually feel unheard or confused,” James explained. “When they understand your philosophy and feel included in the process, most problems disappear.”
He still had occasional difficult conversations. But they happened in private, after everyone had calmed down, within a framework everyone had agreed to.
What These Solutions Have In Common
Rachel, Tom, Daniel, Michelle, Steve, and James all solved different problems. But their approaches shared the same principles.
They designed systems rather than fighting fires. Tom’s multi-level exercises were not reactive to mixed abilities. They were built to accommodate them from the start.
They trusted the environment to teach. Steve’s games did not require him to lecture about passing. The constraints made good decisions obvious.
They invested time upfront to save time later. James’s pre-season meeting took two hours. It saved dozens of hours of parent conflict throughout the season.
They adapted proven approaches rather than constantly inventing. Michelle’s twelve core activities evolved over three seasons. They got better because she refined rather than replaced.
The five problems are universal. The solutions do not have to be discovered from scratch. Coaches have been solving these challenges for years, and what works is surprisingly consistent.
Want systematic solutions to grassroots coaching challenges?
The Football Coaching Academy includes frameworks for mixed abilities, solo coaching, session design, and parent management. Join 1,600+ coaches who stopped struggling with the same problems. $1/month to start.