The Rondo That Made Me Question Everything I Thought I Knew

I watched a coach run a 4v2 rondo that looked identical to mine. Fifteen minutes later, his players were scanning before receiving. Mine were still ball-watching. The difference was not the setup. It was everything else.

I watched a coach named Marcus run a 4v2 rondo at a coaching event. The setup looked identical to the one I ran every week. Four players on corners of a square, two defenders in the middle. Nothing special.

Fifteen minutes later, his players were scanning before receiving and creating angles automatically. Mine were still ball-watching and passing to whoever they happened to be looking at.

The difference was not the setup. It was everything else.

What Marcus Did That I Did not

Marcus never stood silently. Every few seconds he asked a question. “Where is the space opening?” “Can you support on the blindside?” “What is your movement after the pass?”

His players were not just passing a ball. They were thinking through a compressed version of match football.

I counted the decisions his players made in five minutes. Over fifty. Scanning, positioning, timing, weight of pass, body shape, angle of support. More decisions than some of my players made in an entire match.

That is when I understood what rondos were actually for.

The Purpose I had Been Missing

I had been running rondos as keep-ball warm-ups. Marcus was running them as decision-making accelerators.

The real purpose of a rondo is to compress the game into a small space where players must read pressure quickly, recognise passing angles before receiving, make decisions with minimal time, and execute technically under match-realistic conditions.

When properly designed, a rondo develops in minutes what might take hours in full matches. But when I was running them as generic time-fillers, they developed nothing except the ability to pass a ball around in a circle.

Why Mine Were Failing

I went home and analysed what I had been doing wrong.

I had no clear purpose for each rondo. I just set up a 4v2 without considering what specific skill I wanted to develop. The rondo was generic keep-ball with no transfer to matches.

My numbers were wrong for the objective. Too many players on the outside made it too easy. Too few made it frustrating. I had not thought about how the numerical relationship should create the right level of challenge.

My coaching was passive. I stood silently while players passed the ball, missing every learning opportunity. Marcus was constantly prompting thinking.

And my rondos were disconnected from my session theme. I used them as warm-ups that had nothing to do with what came next. They existed in isolation rather than introducing concepts that would appear later.

The Variations That Changed My Sessions

After studying with coaches who understood rondos properly, I discovered that different variations serve different purposes.

The standard 4v2 square develops shape and off-angle support. Four players on corners of an 8-12m square depending on age, two defenders inside. But the key coaching points matter more than the setup. Players need to keep their body position open to see multiple options, support at angles rather than in straight lines, move after passing to create new angles, and communicate to help teammates under pressure.

The 3v1 bounce rondo develops third-player movement and combinations. One player is designated as the bounce player, and the rule is that every pass must go through them first. This creates natural one-two combinations and third-man running patterns that appear constantly in matches through wall passes and lay-offs.

The directional rondo introduces goals or zones to encourage penetration. Standard rondo shape but with small goals or end zones at opposite ends. This variation directly mimics the decision between keeping the ball and playing forward, which is the fundamental possession choice in matches.

The 4 goal rondo builds scanning and spatial awareness. Place four mini goals at corners or sides, and the possession team can score in any goal. This forces constant environment reading as players must continually scan for which goal is open.

The 1-2 rondo develops give-and-go combinations with pace. Every pass must be part of a one-two combination. Player A passes to Player B and immediately moves for the return. Wall passes are one of the most effective ways to beat defenders in tight spaces.

The 2 touch rondo forces quick decisions by removing time. First touch controls, second touch passes, no exceptions. Quality of first touch determines everything, and players must scan before receiving to know the next pass.

The 3 team rotation rondo simulates dynamic transitions. Three teams of 3-4 players, two teams play possession versus one team defending. When defenders win the ball, they immediately become the possession team. The team that lost possession becomes defenders. This trains the mental switch between phases that happens constantly in matches.

The Coaching Prompts That Made The Difference

Marcus did not just ask random questions. His prompts were targeted and purposeful.

Before players received the ball, he asked where they could play from next, where the space was opening, and who would be free if they received it.

During play, he asked whether they could support on the blindside, whether there was a switch available, and what their movement following their pass should be.

After mistakes, he asked what information they missed, where their first touch could have gone, and how they could have kept possession.

For defenders, he asked whether they could predict the next pass, where their partner should be, and what the trigger to press was.

These prompts develop player thinking rather than just physical repetition. Over time, players internalise the questions and ask themselves.

Age-Appropriate Adjustments

What works for U13s does not work for U8s. The variations need adjusting.

For U7-U8, keep it simple with 3v1 or 4v1 in large spaces. The focus is fun and lots of touches. Let them have unlimited touches initially, introduce three-touch later. Eight to ten minutes maximum. The key message is “Can we keep the ball together?”

For U9-U10, introduce variety with 4v2 and directional rondos. The focus shifts to body shape and basic scanning. Two to three touches maximum. Twelve to fifteen minutes. The key message is “Where can you pass before you receive?”

For U11-U12, the full range of variations becomes appropriate. The focus is decision-making speed and combination play. One to two touches maximum. Fifteen to eighteen minutes. The key message is “What is the best option, not just the safe option?”

For U13 and older, high intensity and competitive rondos with consequences. The focus is match-speed thinking and transitions. One to two touches with positional demands. Fifteen to twenty minutes. The key message is “This is how we want to play in matches.”

The Integration That Completes It

The skills practised in your rondo should appear in your main session. The scanning developed in a 4 goal rondo should transfer to match awareness.

If your session theme is playing through midfield pressure, choose a directional rondo that scores by passing through end zones. The same penetration decision appears in your main practice. During the game, you can reference it. “Remember finding the gap in the directional rondo? Same decision here.”

Rondos work best when players understand why they are doing them and how the skills apply to real game situations.

How To Know If It is Working

Watch for immediate indicators. Are players scanning before receiving? Is decision-making quick with minimal hesitation? Are body positions open to multiple options? Is the first touch enabling the next action?

Watch for session indicators. Are skills from the rondo appearing in the main practice? Are players using the same movements in game activities? Is confidence in possession situations increasing?

Watch for match indicators. Are players comfortable receiving under pressure? Is combination play appearing naturally? Are transitions quick between phases? Is positioning in possession intelligent?

If you are seeing these things, your rondos are transferring to match performance. If you are not, something needs adjusting.

What Changed In My Sessions

Six months after watching Marcus, I observed my own 4v2 rondo. Players were scanning before the ball arrived. They were creating angles without being told. They were making decisions at speed.

The setup looked identical to before. The outcomes were completely different.

Because I had stopped running rondos as time-fillers and started running them as decision-making accelerators.


Ready to transform your rondo sessions?

The Football Coaching Academy provides systematic frameworks for running rondos that actually develop players. Join 1,600+ coaches who have discovered that the setup is just the beginning. $1/month to start.